Unbelievable! The Easiest Way to Bypass AI Content Detection - How I Did It!

Andy Stapleton
10 Apr 202409:58

TLDRIn this video, the creator tests five AI content bypass tools to determine their effectiveness against AI detection systems. Starting with a genuine PhD abstract, they rewrite it using AI and then process it through various tools like Fasley AI, Stealth Writer, and Undetectable. The results show that while Turnitin struggles to detect AI content, Originality AI and GPT-0 are more adept. The best tools for bypassing detection are found to be Phrasis and Undetectable, but the creator advises against submitting AI-generated content directly and suggests using it as a foundation for personal understanding and work.

Takeaways

  • 📜 The video discusses the effectiveness of various AI content detection bypass tools.
  • 🔍 The presenter tested five services to see how well they could rewrite AI-generated content to appear human-written.
  • 🎓 The initial test involved a PhD abstract from 2011 to establish a baseline for non-AI content.
  • 📊 Results varied, with some tools failing to detect AI content effectively, while others performed better.
  • 🤖 'Turnitin' was identified as not being very effective at detecting AI-generated content.
  • 🏆 'Originality' was highlighted as the best tool for detecting AI content, even after it had been processed by bypass tools.
  • 🛠️ The presenter paid for all the services to test them, investing a significant amount of money in the process.
  • 📝 Each service was tested by inputting content and receiving a rewritten version, which was then checked for AI detection.
  • 🚫 The video advises against simply copying and pasting the output from these tools for academic submissions due to unnatural language and odd choices in phrasing.
  • 💡 It is suggested that these tools could be used as a scaffold to aid understanding and to build upon with one's own work and paraphrasing.
  • 👍 The video concludes by recommending the use of 'Undetectable' and 'Frase' as the most successful tools in bypassing AI detection, but with a strong cautionary note on ethical use.

Q & A

  • What was the purpose of the original PhD abstract used in the video?

    -The original PhD abstract was used as a control to test AI detection services, ensuring that it was not AI-generated content since it was written in 2011.

  • Which AI detection tool was found to be the least effective in identifying AI-generated content?

    -Turnitin was found to be the least effective in detecting AI-generated content, even when it was purely AI-generated.

  • How did the AI rewrite the original PhD abstract for a thesis?

    -The AI was instructed to rewrite the abstract for a PhD thesis, which resulted in different versions with varying levels of AI originality detection.

  • What were the results of using the AI bypass tool 'Fasley AI' on the abstract?

    -Fasley AI was able to bypass AI detection, with Turnitin showing a 3% chance of AI generation and GPT-0 showing a 0% chance.

  • Which AI bypass tool was the most successful in fooling the 'Originality' detection tool?

    -The 'Undetectable' tool was the most successful, with an Originality score of only 2%, indicating a very low chance of being detected as AI-generated.

  • How did the 'Bypass AI' tool perform in the AI detection tests?

    -Bypass AI did not perform well, as Originality detected it with a 100% chance of being AI-generated.

  • What was the overall conclusion about the effectiveness of AI detection tools after testing the AI bypass tools?

    -The conclusion was that Turnitin and GPT-0 are not as effective in detecting AI content, while Originality was the best at detecting AI content even after bypass attempts.

  • What advice does the video give regarding the use of AI bypass tools for academic work?

    -The video advises against simply copying and pasting AI-generated content into academic submissions. Instead, it suggests using AI-generated content as a scaffold to build upon with one's own understanding and paraphrasing.

  • How much did the testing of AI bypass tools cost the video creator?

    -The testing of AI bypass tools cost the video creator hundreds of dollars, as they paid for all the services used in the tests.

  • What was the final recommendation for using AI content in academic work?

    -The final recommendation was to use AI content as a starting point for understanding and structuring one's own work, rather than submitting it as original content.

Outlines

00:00

🔍 AI Detection Bypass Test Results

The video script discusses the results of testing five different AI detection bypass services. The author starts by verifying the originality of their own PhD abstract written in 2011, which was not AI-generated, to establish a baseline. They then use AI services like Chat GPT to rewrite the abstract and test the effectiveness of AI detection tools such as Turnitin, Originality, and Gp0. The author finds that Turnitin is not very effective in detecting AI content, while Originality performs the best. The script then delves into the individual performance of each AI bypass tool, including Fasley AI, Stealth Writer, and Undetectable, detailing their ability to evade detection and the peculiarities of the rewritten content. The author emphasizes the importance of not simply submitting AI-generated content as one's own and suggests using these tools to scaffold understanding and original work.

05:01

📊 Comparative Analysis of AI Bypass Tools

In this paragraph, the script continues the evaluation of AI bypass tools, focusing on their ability to fool AI detection systems. The author compares the performance of Bypass AI and Hicks Bypass against the detection capabilities of Turnitin, Originality, and Gp0. Bypass AI fails to significantly reduce the AI originality score in Originality's assessment, while Hicks Bypass fares better, though still detectable by Originality with a 56% score. The author concludes that Turnitin and Gp0 are less capable of detecting AI-generated content, whereas Originality remains the most effective. The paragraph ends with a cautionary note against using AI-generated content without proper modification and a suggestion to use such tools for scaffolding one's own work and understanding, rather than for direct submission.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡AI Content Detection

AI Content Detection refers to the use of artificial intelligence to identify and analyze content, particularly to determine if it has been generated by AI algorithms. In the video, the creator tests various services to see how well they can bypass these detection systems, which is central to the theme of the video as it explores the effectiveness of AI in identifying its own kind.

💡PhD Abstract

A PhD Abstract is a brief summary of a doctoral thesis, encapsulating the research's main points and findings. In the script, the creator uses an old PhD abstract, written in 2011, to test the AI detection systems, as it is assumed to be free from AI influence, thus serving as a control in the experiment.

💡Originality

Originality, in the context of the video, refers to the uniqueness and non-plagiarized nature of content. The creator mentions 'originality' as one of the services used to detect AI-generated content, highlighting its importance in academic integrity and the challenge of distinguishing human-written content from AI-generated.

💡AI Bypass Tools

AI Bypass Tools are services designed to modify AI-generated content to make it appear as if it was written by a human, thus avoiding detection by AI content detection systems. The video script discusses several such tools, including Fasley AI and Stealth Writer, and evaluates their effectiveness in fooling AI detectors.

💡Turnitin

Turnitin is a widely used plagiarism detection service in academic institutions. The video script mentions Turnitin as one of the systems that the AI bypass tools are tested against, indicating its prevalence and the desire to outsmart it in terms of AI content detection.

💡GP0

GP0, as mentioned in the script, is another AI content detection tool used to evaluate the effectiveness of the AI bypass tools. It is part of the testing process to see if the modified content can pass undetected as human-written.

💡Fasley AI

Fasley AI is one of the AI bypass tools tested in the video. The creator pays for the service and uses it to attempt to make AI-generated content appear human-written, with the goal of bypassing detection by systems like Turnitin, Originality, and GP0.

💡Stealth Writer

Stealth Writer is another AI bypass tool mentioned in the script. It is used to 'humanize' AI-generated content, aiming to reduce the detectability of AI authorship, and is evaluated based on its success in fooling AI detection systems.

💡Undetectable

Undetectable is an AI bypass tool that the creator has found effective in the past. The video shows its use in the testing process, highlighting its ability to modify content to such an extent that it can potentially evade AI detection.

💡Bypass AI

Bypass AI is an AI bypass tool that the creator has a subscription for, as mentioned in the script. It is used in the testing to see if it can successfully alter AI-generated content to pass undetected by AI content detection systems.

💡Hick Bypass

Hick Bypass is the last AI bypass tool discussed in the video. The creator uses it to attempt to make AI-generated content appear as if it was written by a human, and evaluates its effectiveness based on the results from AI detection tools.

Highlights

The test of five best services to bypass AI detection and the surprising results.

Using a 2011 PhD abstract to test AI detection with zero AI content.

Chat GPT's rewrite of the abstract resulted in high AI originality scores.

Turnitin's poor performance in detecting AI-generated content.

Originality as the best tool for detecting AI content.

Testing five AI bypass removal tools and their effectiveness.

Fasley AI's ability to bypass AI detection with a 3% chance of being AI generated.

Stealth Writer's result with a 39% originality score and zero AI detection by Turnitin and gp0.

Undetectable's performance as one of the best for bypassing AI content detection.

Bypass AI's failure to fool Originality's AI detection with a 100% AI score.

Hick bypass's mixed results with a 56% AI score by Originality.

Turnitin and gp0's ineffectiveness in detecting AI content even after bypass attempts.

Originality's consistent ability to detect AI content despite bypass tools.

The importance of not submitting AI-generated content as one's own work.

Suggestion to use AI content as a scaffold for understanding and not direct submission.

Critique of the unnatural word choices and structure in AI-generated abstracts.

Recommendation to build upon AI content with personal understanding and paraphrasing.

A call to action for viewers to explore other AI tools for academics and researchers.

Casual Browsing

New Way to Bypass AI Detection | How to Humanize AI Content | Article Writing | iTech World

2024-08-31 08:21:00

How to Bypass AI Content Detection (Humanize AI with Bypass GPT)

2024-08-30 13:21:00

AI Detection Bypass: How to Write Undetectable AI Content

2024-08-31 08:41:00

New Way to Bypass AI Detection (Guaranteed) ✅

2024-08-30 13:11:00

How to Bypass TurnItIn AI Writing Detection (ChatGPT)

2024-08-30 13:29:00