How To Check For Plagiarism in Grammarly & Is It Any Good?
TLDRThis video demonstrates how to use Grammarly's premium plagiarism tool and compares its effectiveness with a free online tool, qtex.com. The creator tests Grammarly's checker with four documents: an original piece, a famous paragraph from Charles Dickens' 'A Tale of Two Cities', a New York Times movie review, and a paragraph from a biology textbook. The results show varying levels of accuracy, with Grammarly occasionally overzealous and missing matches, while qtex.com provides different but somewhat better results. The video concludes that there's not much difference between Grammarly's premium feature and free online tools.
Takeaways
- 🔍 Grammarly's plagiarism tool is only available to premium subscribers.
- 📚 The video compares Grammarly's plagiarism checker with a free online tool, qtex.com.
- 📝 The presenter created four documents: one original and three plagiarized from different sources.
- 🤔 Grammarly flagged the original text as similar to a website, showing some overzealousness.
- 🆓 Q-Text did not find any plagiarism in the original text, suggesting higher accuracy.
- 📖 For the famous Dickens text, Grammarly failed to find matches, while Q-Text found partial matches.
- 🎭 The New York Times movie review was correctly identified by both Grammarly and Q-Text.
- 📚 Both tools identified the biology textbook paragraph, but from different sources than the original.
- 🔗 The results show that free online tools can be as effective as Grammarly's premium feature.
- 👨🏫 The video concludes that there's not much difference between Grammarly's premium plagiarism checker and free alternatives.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video?
-The main topic of the video is demonstrating how to use Grammarly's plagiarism tool and comparing its effectiveness with a free online plagiarism tool.
What is the purpose of creating four documents in the Grammarly app?
-The purpose is to test Grammarly's plagiarism checker by comparing its results with a free online tool using a variety of texts, including original writing and copied texts from different sources.
What is the result when the creator's own writing is checked for plagiarism on Grammarly?
-Grammarly incorrectly identifies a small portion of the creator's original writing as similar to text found on a website called justanswer.com.
How does the free online tool perform when checking the creator's own writing for plagiarism?
-The free online tool, qtex.com, returns a nil result, indicating 100% originality, which is more accurate than Grammarly's overzealous detection.
What is the outcome when the famous opening lines from Charles Dickens' novel are checked on Grammarly?
-Grammarly fails to find any matching text on the internet, incorrectly considering the copied text to be 100% original.
How does qtex.com perform when checking the same Charles Dickens text?
-Qtex.com identifies some of the text but from a different website than the one used for copying, showing a better result than Grammarly.
What is the result when the New York Times movie review is checked for plagiarism on Grammarly?
-Grammarly successfully identifies the text as coming from the newspaper article, almost instantaneously.
How does q-text recognize the New York Times movie review text?
-Q-text also recognizes the text but from an archived version on archive.org, not the exact source used for copying.
What is the outcome when the paragraph from the high school biology textbook is checked on Grammarly?
-Grammarly recognizes the text from a website, but not the exact source (amazon.com) where the text was taken from.
How does q-text perform when checking the paragraph from the biology textbook?
-Q-text also identifies the paragraph but from a different website, similar to Grammarly's result.
What is the conclusion of the video regarding Grammarly's plagiarism checker compared to free online tools?
-The conclusion is that there isn't much difference between Grammarly's premium plagiarism checking feature and free checking tools available on the internet.
Outlines
📝 Comparing Grammarly's Plagiarism Checker to a Free Tool
The video begins with the host explaining their intent to compare Grammarly's premium plagiarism tool with a free online alternative. They set up the test by creating four documents in Grammarly: one original piece of writing and three plagiarized texts sourced from various online sources, including a Charles Dickens novel, a New York Times movie review, and a high school biology textbook. The goal is to evaluate how accurately Grammarly's tool detects plagiarism compared to the free online tool, qtex.com.
🔍 Testing Grammarly's Plagiarism Checker
The host tests Grammarly's plagiarism checker on their original work and finds that Grammarly incorrectly identifies a similarity to a text on justanswer.com. This is contrasted with qtex.com, which correctly identifies no plagiarism in the original work. The video then moves on to test the famous opening lines from 'A Tale of Two Cities', where Grammarly fails to find any matching text, incorrectly suggesting the text is original. Qtex.com, however, identifies some of the text from a different source, providing a more accurate result than Grammarly.
🎬 Analyzing Plagiarism in a New York Times Review
The video continues with the host testing Grammarly's plagiarism checker on a New York Times movie review. Grammarly successfully identifies the text as coming from the newspaper article, while qtex.com also recognizes the text, albeit from a different website, archive.org, which is an archived version of the original New York Times article. This demonstrates that both tools can identify plagiarism but may source the original text from different locations.
📚 Checking Plagiarism in a School Biology Textbook
The final test involves a paragraph from a school biology textbook, 'Concepts of Biology'. Grammarly does a good job of recognizing the text, although it identifies a source different from where the text was taken. Qtex.com also identifies the paragraph but from yet another different website, showing that while both tools can detect plagiarism, they may not always pinpoint the exact original source.
🔖 Conclusion and Call to Action
The video concludes with the host summarizing the comparison between Grammarly's premium plagiarism checker and the free online tool. They note that there isn't much difference in the effectiveness of the two tools and encourage viewers to subscribe for more tips and videos. The host also directs viewers to their blog for further information.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Plagiarism
💡Grammarly
💡Premium Subscribers
💡Free Online Plagiarism Tool
💡Charles Dickens
💡New York Times
💡High School Biology Textbook
💡Original Writing
💡JustAnswer.com
💡Qtex.com
💡Creative Commons License
Highlights
Introduction to using Grammarly's plagiarism tool.
Comparison of Grammarly's plagiarism checker with a free online tool.
Creation of four documents for testing: one original and three plagiarized.
First document is an original piece of writing by the creator.
Grammarly's plagiarism checker mistakenly identifies original work as plagiarized.
Qtex.com returns a nil result for the original work, indicating no plagiarism.
Second document is an excerpt from Charles Dickens' 'A Tale of Two Cities'.
Grammarly fails to identify the plagiarized text from 'A Tale of Two Cities'.
Qtex.com identifies the text but from a different source than the one used.
Third document is a movie review from the New York Times.
Grammarly successfully identifies the New York Times movie review as plagiarized.
Qtex.com also recognizes the text, but from an archived version of the article.
Fourth document is a paragraph from a high school biology textbook.
Grammarly recognizes the textbook paragraph but not from the source used.
Qtex.com identifies the paragraph from an educational site with a Creative Commons license.
Grammarly's premium plagiarism feature compared with free online tools.
Conclusion that there is not much difference between Grammarly's and free plagiarism checking tools.
Encouragement to subscribe for more tips and videos.
Mention of the creator's blog for further information.