🔥 AI Detectors HATE This One Simple Trick! [Highly Readable Human Text]
TLDRThis video tutorial outlines a method to create human-like text that avoids detection by AI plagiarism tools. The host recommends using CLAW 2.1 with a prompt from their newsletter, adjusting settings for clarity, and manually rewriting flagged sections for authenticity. The process includes checking the text with ZGPD for AI content, ensuring it's under 5% before submission to Turnitin, which reportedly shows 0% similarity and AI detection.
Takeaways
- 📝 To avoid AI detectors, one doesn't need to introduce grammatical errors and make text unreadable.
- 💻 Use 'claw 2.1' or 'claw 2.0' for creating human-like text without gibberish.
- 💵 Access 'claw 2.1' through entropy console, po.com, or u.com which offer legacy models.
- 📝 The process involves setting the temperature to max and max tokens in the entropy console.
- 📝 Use a two-part prompt provided through a newsletter subscription to initiate the AI.
- 📝 In the entropy console, add 'to conversation' and use the word 'piece' instead of 'essay' to avoid AI detection.
- 💵 The output from the AI is structured and includes a table, list, references, data, and statistics which need verification.
- 💵 Use ZeroGPD as a detector, which is considered the most accurate and a good proxy for Turnitin.
- 📝 After initial detection, selectively rewrite or use a text humanizer on the highlighted AI portions.
- 📝 Reformat and rewrite the text to reduce AI detection percentage, aiming for under 5%.
- 💵 The final text should maintain integrity in terms of grammar and readability while passing AI detectors.
Q & A
What is the main issue discussed in the video?
-The video discusses how to create human-written text that AI detectors find difficult to identify as machine-generated without making intentional grammatical mistakes or making the text unreadable.
What is the recommended tool to use for generating human-like text?
-The recommended tool mentioned in the video is 'claw 2.1' or 'claw 2.0', which can be accessed through the entropy console or other websites like po.com and u.com.
What are the three ways mentioned to access claw 2.1 or claw 2.0?
-The three ways mentioned are the entropy console, po.com, and u.com, all of which provide access to the so-called 'Legacy' models.
What is the significance of the 'prompt' given in the video?
-The 'prompt' is a two-parter that helps in generating text that AI detectors have difficulty identifying as AI-generated. It's given away when subscribing to the presenter's newsletter.
How does the presenter suggest using the entropy console?
-The presenter suggests using the entropy console by setting the temperature to one and max tokens to the right, and then pre-prompting the AI with the given prompt.
What is the purpose of substituting the word 'essay' with 'piece' in the prompt?
-Substituting the word 'essay' with 'piece' is done to avoid triggering claw 2.1's discomfort, which might result in the AI not generating text properly.
How does the presenter use ZGPD to check the AI-generated text?
-The presenter uses ZGPD to check the AI-generated text by pasting it into the tool and running a detection. ZGPD highlights portions of the text it thinks are AI-generated.
What does the presenter suggest doing with the highlighted text from ZGPD?
-The presenter suggests rewriting the highlighted text, which is identified by ZGPD as likely AI-generated, to improve the human-like quality of the text.
What is the presenter's advice regarding the use of a humanizer?
-The presenter advises against using a humanizer that introduces gibberish and instead suggests manually rewriting or using a text humanizer to rewrite only the highlighted portions.
How does the presenter ensure the final text is free from plagiarism and AI detection?
-The presenter ensures the final text is free from plagiarism and AI detection by using Turnitin's similarity index and ZGPD's AI detection feature, aiming for a score of under 5%.
What is the presenter's final recommendation for maintaining text integrity and passing AI detectors?
-The presenter's final recommendation is to use the provided prompt from the newsletter, run it through entropy console or similar, rewrite highlighted portions manually or with a text humanizer, and then check the results with ZGPD and Turnitin.
Outlines
🤖 Improving AI Text with Claw 2.1 and Humanizer
The speaker introduces a method to create human-like text without grammatical errors using Claw 2.1. They suggest using the Entropy console, po.com, or u.com to access Claw 2.0 and 2.1. The process involves setting the temperature to one and max tokens to the right, then using a two-part prompt from a newsletter subscription. The speaker advises against using a humanizer for the entire essay to maintain readability and instead suggests rewriting specific parts. They demonstrate using ZeroGPD to detect AI-generated text and suggest rewriting flagged sections to reduce AI detection to under 5%. The speaker concludes by emphasizing the importance of proper formatting and manual rewriting for the best results.
👋 Closing Remarks
The speaker expresses appreciation to the audience and signs off with a cheerful 'cheers,' indicating the end of the video.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI Detectors
💡Humanizer
💡Claw 2.1
💡Enthropy Console
💡Prompt
💡Temperature
💡Max Tokens
💡ZerGPD
💡Rewrite
💡Turnitin
Highlights
Introduction to a method for creating human-like text without AI detection.
No need for intentional grammatical mistakes to avoid AI detection.
Access to CLAW 2.1 or CLAW 2.0 is necessary for the process.
Three ways to access CLAW models are mentioned: entropy console, po.com, and u.com.
A two-part prompt is provided for subscribers to the newsletter.
Setting the temperature to max and tokens to the right in CLAW 2.1.
Using 'piece' instead of 'essay' to avoid CLAW 2.1 discomfort.
The resulting text is structured with tables, lists, references, data, and statistics.
Double-checking the data and statistics in the generated text is advised.
Using zero GPD as a detector and proxy for Turnitin.
Formatting the text is recommended before pasting into zero GPD.
Highlighting AI-generated portions in the text by zero GPD.
Rewriting the highlighted AI-generated text to reduce AI detection.
Using 'rewrite' instead of 'rephrase' for better results in CLAW 2.1.
Reducing AI detection percentage points by rewriting.
Possibility of further rewriting or using a humanizer for improvement.
Achieving sub-4% AI detection rate after rewriting.
Demonstration of using a humanizer without introducing gibberish.
Final AI detection results showing 0% similarity and AI detection.
Process is simple and maintains text integrity while passing AI detectors.
Encouragement to subscribe to the newsletter for free text humanizer.